European countries were forced by the US to accept the Tetra system for their police and army some years ago. Barrie Trower talked about this. He wrote a report about it for the police unions. Tetra seems to enrage and madden and make violent, just as EMFs do, but more so.
Tetra system is far too dangerous for two reasons. Firstly you have to carry the system on your chest and the signal is transmitted through your brain and neck and some of the police man has to do 14 hours shifts. Secondly the pulse frequency of TETRA, which is around 16 pulses in second it’s to close to brain natural frequency which is 17 pulses in second. The bit frequency of the brain is responsible for making decision in emergency situations and if you mess up that, you can’t make a decision. Police has to do exactly the decisions in emergency situations.
A scientific experiment Barrie Trower is carried out on the police and emergency services to see how much cancer and how much brain damage is caused by the Tetra Airwave System The police federation published a document, which Barrie Trower referenced in his latest report, and it acutally says: We know that this system is now dangerous, but as it is up and running we can not do anything about that. By: The World Foundation for Natural Science – http://www.naturalscience.org
WHAT IS ALL THIS REALLY ABOUT?
Imagine the field around a magnet and imagine ordinary everyday static electricity. If you put the force field from the magnet with the force field from the static electricity you make a wave. This wave is called an electromagnetic wave. There are lots of different types of electromagnetic waves but they are all made of the same two things – magnetic and static. The only difference between the waves is their wavelength or the length of the wave and the number of waves that can be produced a second, i.e. the frequency. All of these waves are put into a table called the electromagnetic spectrum.
At one end of this electromagnetic spectrum you have the very short waves, namely gamma rays and x-rays and at the other end of the spectrum you have the very longways, namely radio, TV and waves from overhead power cables. All of these wave shave the same properties; that is to say they all behave the same.
In this country, when somebody asks about whether a certain level ofelectromagnetic radiation is safe they are usually quoted a safety limit. A safety limit is really a personal opinion. This personal opinion may be based on many factors by an individual or individuals from whatever data they have in their possession.
Here you have it folks. The connection between spraying our skies with heavy metals, as part of the global geoengineering programme, and 5G technology. This is a mass surveillance system. They can track and trace anyone anywhere which this technology. Additionally, it’s equipped with beam-forming technology which allows it to basically lock on to targets and direct a focused beam of electromagnetic waves to that target.
5G – Target Acquiring System – Battlefield Interrogation – Phased Array – Small Cells – LED’s – Masquerading – Radar system – It’s important to understand what the 5G is doing and what they say it’s doing. 5G technology can cook your eyes like eggs in the World War 2 – Directed Energy Weapons – Control management system – Target Acquired – Isolation frequencies. You all need to understand this are the military weapons, these are Antonius’s frequencies. Smart technology – Secret Militarized Armaments in Residential Technology – RFID CHIPS – Radio Frequency Identity Tags – Economic & Biological Terrorism. If you garters nothing more than that that’s what you need to know it’s microwave radiation for sure. Chemtrails & Geo-Engineering – A.I. as a Proxy with Massive MIMO Technology – Conventional 8T8R – M-MIMO 64T64R – 4G LTE 214 Mbps – M.I.M.O. Tanks – Massive IN Massive OUT – Health Hazard – An Existential Threat to People & Planet
Please You Must See – 5G APOCALYPSE – THE EXTINCTION EVENT A full length documentary by Sacha Stone exposing the 5G existential threat to humanity in a way we never imagined possible! Please SHARE this as widely as you feel drawn…use it to target your local bureaucrats, technocrats, health practitioners, local and federal government agencies and more than anything else…your family and friends. Featuring in this film: weapons development experts, biologists, molecular & cellular biologists, blood microscopists, activists, as well as good leaders out there on the frontline. We know what this technology is – we know how it was conceived and we know where it is intended to take people and planet. We are drawing the line here….and we are doing so with the full fire of consciousness. Arise Homo sapiens! Thank you very much #Stop#5G#Stop5G
New research in biomechanics suggests that young people are developing hornlike spikes at the back of their skulls — bone spurs caused by the forward tilt of the head, which shifts weight from the spine to the muscles at the back of the head, causing bone growth in the connecting tendons and ligaments. The weight transfer that causes the buildup can be compared to the way the skin thickens into a callus as a response to pressure or abrasion.
A pair of researchers at the University of the Sunshine Coast in Queensland, Australia, has advanced the idea in several peer-reviewed journals that the prevalence of the bone growth in younger adults, which they have observed in X-rays, reflects distorted posture. The cause, they hypothesize, is prolonged use of smartphones and other handheld devices, which require users to bend their heads forward to make sense of what’s happening on the miniature screens.
In this testimony the Senator shared
information from the Bioinitiative Report, microwave sickness, the
health risks of 5G, the concerns about millimeter waves, concerns about
Wi-Fi in schools, the problems with FCC limits and much more.
The research of UK Physicist Dr. John Walker has found cancer clusters forming around areas within 400 meters of mobile phone masts, after approximately five years, initially especially for those living in the beams of these microwave radiation emissions!
By 2007 seven cancer clustes had beeen discovered in the UK around mobile phone masts. Of six research studies looking specifically at health effects of phone masts, every one found significant effects below international guidelines. Half of them found significangly increased incidence of cancer in people living near a mast.
The Enrico Grani Story
14 die of cancer in seven years living next to phone mast with highest radiation levels in UK
By Rebecca Camber 23rd June 2008
Fourteen people living within a mile of a mobile phone mast that emits one of the highest levels of radiation in the country have died of cancer.
Four of the deaths have been in a cul-de-sac yards from the site.
A further 20 residents have developed tumors in the last seven years, although they have survived.
By EMMA MORTON Health and Science Editor October 10, 2007
FOUR pupils from a school surrounded by 15 mobile shone masts have been struck down by brain cancer.
Kindergarten Children in City of Ruitz Struck Down with Brain Tumors near Mast
In November 2005, the mayor of Ruitz (1588 inhabitants) reported to the French Department of Health the occurrence of two brain cancers in children who attended the kindergarten of Ruitz. One of the children died in 2004, the second case was diagnosed in November 2005. Near the school a cell phone base station has been in use since the beginning of October 1998 when it was installed.
The parents suspect the base station may have been the cause of he cancers. The regulaory authorities given the usual excuses: “The amount of radiation is within limits of what is deemed to be save by the government and other regulating bodies.”
Seven Working under Cell-Phone Mast Struck Down with Brain Tumors
A total of seven staff members working on the top floors of the Tipoli Building under cell phone antennae at RMIT University in Melbourne, Australia since 2001 had developed brain tumors by 2006. They had been working in the building for approximately five years.
Dr. Vini G. Khurana Ph.D. / Neurosurgeon – Mobile Phone-Brain Tumor: Public Health Advisory
“There is a growing body of statistically significant evidence for a relationship between the overall length of use of a mobile phone and the delayed occurrence of a brain tumor on the same side of the head as the ‘preferred side’ for mobile phone usage.”
“We found that cells inside the brain, after exposure to radiofrequency radiation, had DNA damage. These are so-called strand breaks. The DNA basically break up into pieces. In my experiment, I only expose animals for a short time. Then the question is, what happens if you’re exposed to radiation, for example, from cell towers? ” – Dr. Henry Lai, Ph.D.
Dr. Henry Lai, Ph.D. Bioelectromagnetics Expert: first to find DNA breaks! Dr. Henry Lai heads the Bioelectromagnetics Research Laboratory at the Universe of Washington in Seattle. Lai and colleague Narendra Singh conducted research that found DNA breaks in the brain cells of rats exposed to radio frequency radiation (Sun-Sentinel/Kathy Sauber / September 30, 2005 – PubMed )
Another study has used the finite-difference time-domain method and a new millimeter-resolution anatomically based model of the human to study electromagnetic energy coupled to the head due to mobile telephones at 835 and 1900 MHz. Assuming reduced dimensions characteristic of today’s mobile telephones, the authors have obtained SAR distributions for two different lengths of monopole antennas of lengths λ/4 and 3λ/8 for a model of the adult male and reduced-scale models of 10- and 5-year-old children and find that peak one-voxel and 1-g SARs are larger for the smaller models of children, particularly at 835 MHz. Also, a larger in-depth penetration of absorbed energy for these smaller models is obtained. The authors have also studied the effect of using the widely disparate tissue properties reported in the literature and of using homogeneous instead of the anatomically realistic heterogeneous models on the SAR distributions. Homogeneous models are shown to grossly overestimate both the peak 1-voxel and 1-g SARs. Last, the authors show that it is possible to use truncated one-half or one-third models of the human head with negligible errors in the calculated SAR distributions. This simplification will allow considerable savings in computer memory and computation times30,2005 )
Dr. Paul Heroux, Faculty of Medicine, Director of Occupational Health Program within the Department of Epidemiology, Statistics and Occupational Health at Mc Gill university, discusses industry responsibility and influence on deploying wireless technology. Lloyds of London nor Swiss Re will underwrite a liability policy for electromagnetic radiation, setting up an environment ripe for a Class Action Lawsuit.He points out the link between wireless technology and cancer, warning that we need to be cleaning up and reducing our exposure to wireless radiation not adding new frequencies and infrastructure. He notes that every American at one time needed a chicken in every pot but wireless radiation is a bad idea and we need fiberoptic on every home.
Lloyd’s leave all that money ?
How curious that Lloyds of London has excluded from their policies any negative health effects caused by wi-fi technologies. Now, WHY would Lloyds leave all that money on the table if these technologies are so safe? And, why are other insurance companies following Lloyds’ lead?
The Observer published an article in 1999 that stated: “Lloyd’s underwriters refuse to insure mobile phone manufacturers against the risk of damage to users’ health.”
That article was unequivocally clear. The insurers had “fears mobile phones will be linked to illnesses such as cancer and Alzheimer’s disease.” Twenty years ago, the industry already knew their business models were a risk to the general public, especially because insurers were already refusing to cover their biggest liabilities.
Federal regulations protect the public only from the thermal (i.e., heating) risk due to short-term exposure to high intensity, cell tower radiation. The Federal regulations ignore the hundreds of studies that find harmful bio-effects from long-term exposure to non-thermal levels of cell phone radiation. The Telecommunications Act of 1996 does not allow communities to stop the siting of cell towers for health reasons. Nevertheless, landlords may be liable for any harm caused by cell phone radiation emitted by towers situated on their property. Localities need to organize and change the Federal law to protect public health and wildlife from exposure to microwave radiation emitted by mobile phone base stations.
As of March 10, 2019, www.antennasearch.com, an industry website, reports 712,000 cell towers and 1.98 million cell antennas in the U.S. We cannot verify the accuracy of these data because the FCC only collects data on certain types of cell towers.
Following are some resources regarding the health effects of exposure to cell tower radiation. I will occasionally update this page.
Dr. Sharon Goldberg testified in opposition to Senate Bills 637 and 894 in October, 2018 pertaining to 5G wireless infrastructure legislation, which passed though the Michigan House Energy Policy Committee with a vote of 15 to 4. Dr. Sharon Goldberg, an internal medicine physician & professor gives her testimony regarding 5g technology dangers specifically involving electromagnetic radiation. She says: “Wireless radiation has biological effects. Period.”
Dr. Goldberg has provided us one of the clearest and most compelling explanations of the effects of wireless radiation on human health, expertly navigating the associations between this non-ionizing radiation and chronic health effects. She was Assistant Professor at New York City’s Mount Sinai Hospital; Albert Einstein College of Medicine and at the University of Miami Miller School of Medicine. Here Dr. Goldberg speaks in opposition to SB 637 and SB 894, Michigan bills fast tracking the deployment of 5G small cells which will carry not just 5G but a mix of 2G, 3G and 4G frequencies. She notes this technology is not tested or monitored for exposure nor health or environmental effects.
Wireless radiation has biological effects. Period. This is no longer a subject for debate when you look at PubMed and the peer-review literature. These effects are seen in all life forms; plants, animals, insects, microbes. In humans, we have clear evidence of cancer now: there is no question We have evidence of DNA damage, cardiomyopathy, which is the precursor of congestive heart failure, neuropsychiatric effects…5G is an untested application of a technology that we know is harmful; we know it from the science. In academics, this is called human subjects research.” – Goldberg
Dr. Sharon Goldberg
Sharon Goldberg – University of New Mexico | UNM – Department of Internal Medicine
Olle Johansson, associate professor at
the Karolinska Institute (retired Nov 2017, still active), Department of
Neuroscience, and head of The Experimental Dermatology Unit, has a long
background in the neurosciences and has coauthored – together with his
supervisor professor Tomas Hökfelt and many others, including Nobel
Laureates – up to the presentation of his doctoral thesis 143 original
papers, reviews, book chapters and conference abstracts, a publication
record hard to beat! His doctoral thesis at the Karolinska Institute was
entitled ”Peptide Neurons in the Central and Peripheral Nervous System. Light and Electron Microscopic Studies”.
Olle Johansson has participated in more
than 300 congresses, symposia and meetings as an invited speaker, and
with free contributions and as an invited ’observer’ at an additional
200. His studies have been widely recognized in the public media,
including newspapers, radio and TV as well as on the Internet, both
nationally as well as internationally, and he is a regular interview
guest in magazines, journals, tabloids and newspapers, as well as in
radio shows, TV programmes and in the Internet-based news blogs and
Olle Johansson is a world-leading authority in the field of EMF radiation and health effects. Among many achievements he coined the term ”screen dermatitis” which later on was developed into the functional impairment electrohypersensitivity which recognition mainly is due to his work. He has also been a guest professor as well as adjunct professor in basic and clinical neuroscience at the Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm.
His research group continues to investigate adverse health effects of
modern, man-made, artificial electromagnetic fields as well as the
functional impairment electrohypersensitivity. The very early
introduction of the clinical term “screen dermatitis” was done to
explain the cutaneous damages that developed in the late 1970s when
office workers, first mostly women, began to be placed in front of
computer monitors. Olle Johansson then called for action along lines of
occupational medicine, biophysics and biochemistry, as well as
neuroscience and experimental dermatology. The working hypothesis early
became that persons with the impairment electrohypersensitivity react in
a cellularly correct way to the electromagnetic radiation, maybe in
concert with chemical emissions such as plastic components, flame
retardants, etc., in a highly specific way and with a completely correct
avoidance reaction — just as you would do if you had been exposed to
e.g. sun rays, X-rays, radioactivity or chemical odors.
Nowadays, electrohypersensitivity (EHS) is in Sweden an officially
fully recognized functional impairment (i.e., it is not regarded as a
disease). Survey studies show that somewhere between 230,000-290,000
Swedish men and women—out of a population of 10,000,000—report a variety
of symtoms when being in contact with electromagnetic field sources. To
this, one should also add all the current issues regarding the bigger
picture: the health effects of electromagnetic fields on the general
population, including memory, concentration and learning difficulties,
neurological damage and cancer, immune system impairments, fertility
issues, as well as impacts on other animals, plants and bacteria.
Olle Johansson and his collaborators have, in
addition, worked in great depth in areas such as skin diseases, cancer,
child delivery, female urine incontinence, oral mucosa diseases, brain
and spinal cord morphology, synaptology and chemical transmission,
peripheral nervous system-related issues, cardiac function, skeletal
muscle function and disease, and connective tissue ripening phenomena.
He has published more than 600 original
articles, reviews, book chapters and conference reports within the
fields of basic and applied neuroscience, dermatoscience, epidemiology,
and biophysiology. He has received a number of awards, including the
Nokia Consumer Electronics Award, The Grand Environment Award of the
Cancer and Allergy Foundation, the SIF Award, Tandvårdsskadeförbundets
Pris, and many more.
Olle Johansson is – or has been – a member of,
i.a., The European Neuroscience Association (ENA), The European Society
for Dermatological Research (ESDR), IBAS Users of Scandinavia (IBUS),
The International Brain Research Organization (IBRO), The International
Society for Stereology (ISS), The New York Academy of Sciences, The
Royal Microscopical Society (RMS), Scandinavian Society for Electron
Microscopy (SCANDEM), The Skin Pharmacology Society (SPS), Society for
Neuroscience, Svenska Fysiologföreningen, Svenska Intressegruppen för
Grafisk Databehandling (SIGRAD), Svenska Läkaresällskapet, and the
Svenska Sällskapet för Automatiserad Bildanalys (SSAB).
Dangers of Smart Meters
Some of Research papers and scientific articles
Wang L, Hilliges M, Jernberg T, Wiegleb-Edstrom D, Johansson O,
”Protein gene product 9.5-immunoreactive nerve fibres and cells in human
skin”, Cell Tissue Res 1990; 261: 25-33
Johansson O, Hilliges M, Bjornhagen V, Hall K, ”Skin changes in
patients claiming to suffer from ”screen dermatitis”: a two-case
open-field provocation study”, Exp Dermatol 1994; 3: 234-238
Johansson O, Virtanen M, Hilliges M, ”Histaminergic nerves demonstrated in the skin. A new direct mode of neurogenic inflammation?”, Exp Dermatol 1995; 4: 93-96